# Blink UX: UX agency research profile

> Candidate profile for Blink UX. Source records are first-pass leads; claims and agency roles still need individual verification. This is not a recommendation or overall ranking.

- Official website: https://blinkux.com/
- Research region: United States · global offices
- Focus: Research-led product design and enterprise experience work
- Overall rank: none
- Research status: First-pass source leads · candidate profile only. These links are starting points for checking the stated claims; they have not all been revalidated for this release.

## Listed capability research

- [UI/UX Design](https://uxcomparation.com/categories/ui-ux-design.md): editorial category order, not a performance score.
- [UX Research](https://uxcomparation.com/categories/ux-research.md): editorial category order, not a performance score.
- [Enterprise UX](https://uxcomparation.com/categories/enterprise-ux.md): editorial category order, not a performance score.
- [Website Redesign](https://uxcomparation.com/categories/website-redesign.md): editorial category order, not a performance score.

## Research note

NASA and Mphasis sources support project attribution; detailed methods and reported results are primarily agency-authored. Clutch has only one visible YMCA review, so it is a narrow client-feedback sample.

## Areas to investigate

### Research depth

**Question:** Which named projects show methods, participant groups, and how findings changed the product?

**Evidence to seek:** A detailed case or client account identifying research activity and agency role.

### Research-to-delivery attribution

**Question:** Which NASA.gov research activities and design-system decisions are also documented by NASA or delivery partners?

**Evidence to seek:** Client-side account of Blink’s responsibilities, launch, accessibility acceptance, and governance.

### Enterprise product work

**Question:** Beyond public-sector web platforms, which named cases document complex product workflows and shipped software?

**Evidence to seek:** Specific project scope, user roles, agency responsibilities, and client-side evidence.

## Sources and evidence

Each source supports only the specific claim described. Follow the source and confirm its current content before relying on it.

### [NASA.gov research and redesign case](https://blinkux.com/work/nasa-case-study)

- Publisher: Blink UX
- Source type: Agency-published portfolio / case study
- Claim to check: Names NASA, identifies Blink’s research/design role, and documents national research, accessibility work, usability sessions, and the Horizon design system.
- Not rechecked for this release.
- Limitation: Agency-authored case. NASA and Mphasis announcements corroborate the partnership; outcomes remain mostly described by Blink.

### [NASA.gov redesign announcement](https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/533091-apr-jun-2023-it-talk-design-0.pdf)

- Publisher: NASA
- Source type: Public-sector publication
- Claim to check: NASA publication identifies Blink UX as a collaborator on the redesigned NASA.gov.
- Not rechecked for this release.
- Limitation: Corroborates project attribution, not an independent evaluation of usability.

### [Blink UX on Clutch](https://clutch.co/profile/blink-ux)

- Publisher: Clutch
- Source type: Client-review and business directory
- Claim to check: One verified YMCA of Greater Seattle review details website consolidation, UX research, and reported post-launch user and engagement increases.
- Not rechecked for this release.
- Limitation: Single-review sample, project dates 2016; outcomes are client-reported and should not be generalized.

Official profile: https://uxcomparation.com/agencies/blink-ux/